Cady v. Georgia

Supreme Court

Cady v. Georgia

323 U.S. 676, 65 S. Ct. 190

Supreme Court of the United States·Decided November 20, 1944·No. No. 584·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam:

The appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. § 237 (a), Judicial Code, as amended, 28 U. S. C., § 344 (a); [677]*677United States Supreme Court Rule 9; Flournoy v. Wiener, 321 U. S. 253, 259, and cases cited; Seaboard Air Line R. Co. v. Watson, 287 U. S. 86, 91. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was allowed as a petition for writ of certiorari as required by § 237 (c) of the Judicial Code, as amended, 28 U. S. C., § 344 (c), certiorari is denied.

Mr. Harry M. Wilson for appellant. Messrs. T. Grady Head, Attorney General of Georgia, and Victor Davidson, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam:

The appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. § 237 (a), Judicial Code, as amended, 28 U. S. C., § 344 (a); [677]*677United States Supreme Court Rule 9; Flournoy v. Wiener, 321 U. S. 253, 259, and cases cited; Seaboard Air Line R. Co. v. Watson, 287 U. S. 86, 91. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was allowed as a petition for writ of certiorari as required by § 237 (c) of the Judicial Code, as amended, 28 U. S. C., § 344 (c), certiorari is denied.

Mr. Harry M. Wilson for appellant. Messrs. T. Grady Head, Attorney General of Georgia, and Victor Davidson, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

Cady v. Georgia, 323 U.S. 676, 65 S. Ct. 190 (1944).

Pincite

323 U.S. 676 (Cady v. Georgia) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related