CadleRock Joint Venture, L.P. v. Klar

278 A.D.2d 39, 717 N.Y.S.2d 525, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12687
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 7, 2000·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Gerald Esposito, J.), entered July 10, 2000, which, inter alia, denied defendant-appellant’s motion to vacate a deficiency judgment entered against him on default, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

Defendant’s claim that plaintiff is a foreign limited partnership doing business in New York without authority, and is therefore maintaining this action in violation of Partnership Law § 121-907 (a), is unsupported by any evidence of systematic and regular activity (see, Alicanto, S.A. v Woolverton, 129 [40] AD2d 601, 602; cf., Partnership Law § 121-902 [b]). Nor does defendant offer any persuasive evidence on valuation. Concur— Rosenberger, J. P., Williams, Andrias, Buckley and Friedman, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

CadleRock Joint Venture, L.P. v. Klar, 278 A.D.2d 39, 717 N.Y.S.2d 525, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12687 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

278 A.D.2d 39 (CadleRock Joint Venture, L.P. v. Klar) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Valsirv Realty Co. v. Tenenbaum
304 A.D.2d 748 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2003)