Cadle v. Baker

87 U.S. 650, 22 L. Ed. 448, 20 Wall. 650, 1874 U.S. LEXIS 1454
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided January 11, 1875·No. 13·Published·Cited by 21 cases

Opinion

The CHIEF JUSTICE

delivered the opinion of the court.

We think such averments as the defendant alleges to be necessary and the want of which he has assigned for cause of demurrer, were not necessary. The debtors of a bank, when sued by a receiver, cannot inquire into the legality of his appointment. It is sufficient for the purposes of such a suit that he has been appointed and is receiver in fact.' As to debtors, the action of «the - comptroller in making the appointment is conclusive until set aside on the application of the bank. The bank may move in that behalf, but the debtor cannot. Section fifty makes express provision for a contest by the bank.

The court below erred in sustáining the demurrer, and for that reason the judgment is reversed and the cause remanded with instructions to overrule .the demurrer to the declaration and

Proceed accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cadle v. Baker, 87 U.S. 650, 22 L. Ed. 448, 20 Wall. 650, 1874 U.S. LEXIS 1454 (1875).

87 U.S. 650 (Cadle v. Baker) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Arkansas Louisiana Gas Company v. H. A. Kroeger
303 F.2d 129 (Fifth Circuit, 1962)
Stevens v. Carolina Scenic Stages
208 F.2d 332 (Fourth Circuit, 1954)
Ross v. Long
258 N.W. 94 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1934)
Michigan State Industries v. Fischer Hardware Co.
197 N.E. 785 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1934)
Thomas v. Hubbard
4 F. Supp. 520 (W.D. Pennsylvania, 1933)
Grant v. A. B. Leach & Co.
280 U.S. 351 (Supreme Court, 1930)
McCaskill v. Chattahoochee Fertilizer Co.
146 S.E. 830 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1929)
Main v. Schroeder
214 N.W. 664 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1927)
Simmons & Kell v. Freeman
90 S.E. 965 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1916)
Weitzel v. Brown
112 N.E. 945 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1916)
Jacobson v. Berry
135 Ill. App. 415 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1907)
Lyons v. Bank of Discount of New York
154 F. 391 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York, 1907)
Threadgill v. Colcord
1906 OK 12 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1906)
Metropolitan National Bank v. Commercial State Bank
74 N.W. 26 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1898)
Greenawalt v. Wilson
52 Kan. 109 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1893)
Peters v. Foster
10 N.Y.S. 389 (New York Supreme Court, 1890)
Barbour v. National Exchange Bank
45 Ohio St. (N.S.) 133 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1887)
Case v. Small
10 F. 722 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Louisiana, 1881)
Green v. Dyersburg
10 F. Cas. 1099 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Tennessee, 1879)
Sanger v. Upton
91 U.S. 56 (Supreme Court, 1875)