CADLE COMPANY v. Bankston & Lobingier
893 S.W.2d 949
Opinion
The CADLE COMPANY, Petitioners,
v.
BANKSTON & LOBINGIER, a Partnership, Betty C. Bankston, Individually, and as Independent Executrix of the Estate of John R. Bankston, the Community Estate of John R. Bankston and Betty C. Bankston, David B. Lobingier, and the Community Estate of David B. Lobingier and Gay A. Lobingier, Respondents.
Supreme Court of Texas.
Michael L. Jones, Dallas, for petitioners.
David B. Lobingier, Kathryn S. Lanford and David L. Evans, Fort Worth, for respondents.
PER CURIAM.
Petitioner's application for writ of error is denied. The Court neither approves nor disapproves of the court of appeals' discussion of mental anguish damages. 868 S.W.2d 918, 924.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
CADLE COMPANY v. Bankston & Lobingier, 893 S.W.2d 949 (Tex. 1994).
893 S.W.2d 949 (CADLE COMPANY v. Bankston & Lobingier) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Cadle Co. v. Bankston & Lobingier
868 S.W.2d 918 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1994)
Cadle Co. v. Bankston & Lobingier
893 S.W.2d 949 (Texas Supreme Court, 1994)