CADLE COMPANY v. Bankston & Lobingier
893 S.W.2d 949
This text of 893 S.W.2d 949 (CADLE COMPANY v. Bankston & Lobingier) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
CADLE COMPANY v. Bankston & Lobingier, 893 S.W.2d 949 (Tex. 1994).
Opinion
The CADLE COMPANY, Petitioners,
v.
BANKSTON & LOBINGIER, a Partnership, Betty C. Bankston, Individually, and as Independent Executrix of the Estate of John R. Bankston, the Community Estate of John R. Bankston and Betty C. Bankston, David B. Lobingier, and the Community Estate of David B. Lobingier and Gay A. Lobingier, Respondents.
Supreme Court of Texas.
Michael L. Jones, Dallas, for petitioners.
David B. Lobingier, Kathryn S. Lanford and David L. Evans, Fort Worth, for respondents.
PER CURIAM.
Petitioner's application for writ of error is denied. The Court neither approves nor disapproves of the court of appeals' discussion of mental anguish damages. 868 S.W.2d 918, 924.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cadle Co. v. Bankston & Lobingier
868 S.W.2d 918 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1994)
Cadle Co. v. Bankston & Lobingier
893 S.W.2d 949 (Texas Supreme Court, 1994)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
893 S.W.2d 949, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cadle-company-v-bankston-lobingier-tex-1994.