Cadle Company II, Inc. v. Pm Group, Inc.
745 N.W.2d 793, 480 Mich. 1135, 2008 Mich. LEXIS 495
This text of 745 N.W.2d 793 (Cadle Company II, Inc. v. Pm Group, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Cadle Company II, Inc. v. Pm Group, Inc., 745 N.W.2d 793, 480 Mich. 1135, 2008 Mich. LEXIS 495 (Mich. 2008).
Opinion
CADLE COMPANY II, INC., Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
P.M. GROUP, INC., Defendant, and
Daniel D. Armistead, Defendant-Appellant.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 25, 2007 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
745 N.W.2d 793, 480 Mich. 1135, 2008 Mich. LEXIS 495, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cadle-company-ii-inc-v-pm-group-inc-mich-2008.