Cadiz v. Goord

241 A.D.2d 687, 663 N.Y.S.2d 1011, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7343
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJuly 10, 1997
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 241 A.D.2d 687 (Cadiz v. Goord) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cadiz v. Goord, 241 A.D.2d 687, 663 N.Y.S.2d 1011, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7343 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1997).

Opinion

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule.

After a search of his cube divulged a vial of prescription medication that had exceeded its expiration date, as well as three unidentified tablets that had been secreted in a container of dental floss, petitioner was found guilty of violating the prison disciplinary rule that prohibits possession of unauthorized medication. Substantial evidence supports the determination of petitioner’s guilt. The misbehavior report, standing alone, is sufficiently detailed and probative to constitute substantial evidence (see, Matter of Foster v Coughlin, 76 NY2d 964, 966). Additionally, petitioner admitted in his testimony before the Hearing Officer that the unauthorized medications in question were his. Petitioner’s remaining contentions have been examined and found to be either without merit or unpreserved for our review.

Crew III, J. P., White, Yesawich Jr., Peters and Carpinello, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Odom v. Goord
271 A.D.2d 792 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)
Herbin v. Lacy
252 A.D.2d 608 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)
Richards v. Kuhlmann
251 A.D.2d 939 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
241 A.D.2d 687, 663 N.Y.S.2d 1011, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7343, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cadiz-v-goord-nyappdiv-1997.