Cadillac Publishing Company, Inc., a Corporation v. Arthur E. Summerfield, Postmaster General, and Maurice H. Stans, Deputy Postmaster General
267 F.2d 620, 105 U.S. App. D.C. 343, 1958 U.S. App. LEXIS 6103
Opinion
Upon consideration of appellees’ suggestion of mootness and of appellant’s answer, it is
Ordered by the Court that the judgment of the District Court appealed from herein be, and it is hereby, vacated and that this case be, and it is hereby, remanded to the District Court with instructions to dismiss the complaint as moot.
BURGER, Circuit Judge, did not participate in the foregoing order.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cadillac Publishing Company, Inc., a Corporation v. Arthur E. Summerfield, Postmaster General, and Maurice H. Stans, Deputy Postmaster General, 267 F.2d 620, 105 U.S. App. D.C. 343, 1958 U.S. App. LEXIS 6103 (D.C. Cir. 1958).
267 F.2d 620 (Cadillac Publishing Company, Inc., a Corporation v. Arthur E. Summerfield, Postmaster General, and Maurice H. Stans, Deputy Postmaster General) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Aviation Enterprises, Inc. v. The Honorable Vern Orr
716 F.2d 1403 (D.C. Circuit, 1983)
Aviation Entersprises, Inc. v. Orr
716 F.2d 1403 (D.C. Circuit, 1983)
Richard Weaver v. United Mine Workers of America, W. A. Boyle v. Richard Weaver
492 F.2d 580 (D.C. Circuit, 1973)
Anna Masszonia v. Walter E. Washington
476 F.2d 915 (D.C. Circuit, 1973)
Big Table, Inc. v. Schroeder
186 F. Supp. 254 (N.D. Illinois, 1960)