Cadillac Mutual Insuurance v. Owens

Michigan Court of Appeals

Cadillac Mutual Insuurance v. Owens

167 N.W.2d 819, 16 Mich. App. 235, 1969 Mich. App. LEXIS 1354

CourtMichigan Court of Appeals

DecidedFebruary 27, 1969

DocketDocket No. 4,404

StatusPublished

This text of 167 N.W.2d 819 (Cadillac Mutual Insuurance v. Owens) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cadillac Mutual Insuurance v. Owens, 167 N.W.2d 819, 16 Mich. App. 235, 1969 Mich. App. LEXIS 1354 (Mich. Ct. App. 1969).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

In a non jury trial, at the conclusion of proofs, the trial court entered a judgment of no cause of action on plaintiffs’ declaration and a judgment in favor of defendant Owens on her cross-[236]*236declaration for damages in an automobile negligence action.

On appeal, plaintiffs challenge the trial court’s finding that plaintiff Dunn’s wife was negligent and that defendant Florence Owens was not.

A review of the record discloses evidentiary support for the trial court’s findings. The appellants have failed to demonstrate to this Court that the action of the trial court in denying judgment for plaintiffs and entering a judgment in favor of defendant was clearly erroneous.

Affirmed. Costs to appellee.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

In a non jury trial, at the conclusion of proofs, the trial court entered a judgment of no cause of action on plaintiffs’ declaration and a judgment in favor of defendant Owens on her cross-[236]*236declaration for damages in an automobile negligence action.

On appeal, plaintiffs challenge the trial court’s finding that plaintiff Dunn’s wife was negligent and that defendant Florence Owens was not.

A review of the record discloses evidentiary support for the trial court’s findings. The appellants have failed to demonstrate to this Court that the action of the trial court in denying judgment for plaintiffs and entering a judgment in favor of defendant was clearly erroneous.

Affirmed. Costs to appellee.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

167 N.W.2d 819, 16 Mich. App. 235, 1969 Mich. App. LEXIS 1354, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cadillac-mutual-insuurance-v-owens-michctapp-1969.