Cadenhead v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Cadenhead v. State

585 So. 2d 1192, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 9687, 1991 WL 187304

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedSeptember 23, 1991

DocketNo. 91-4

StatusPublished

This text of 585 So. 2d 1192 (Cadenhead v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cadenhead v. State, 585 So. 2d 1192, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 9687, 1991 WL 187304 (Fla. Ct. App. 1991).

Pincite

Opinion

JOANOS, Chief Judge.

Eric Paul Cadenhead appeals the sentences imposed upon him, based upon a sentencing guidelines point total calculated by multiplying the number of points assessed for legal constraint by the number of his felony convictions. The state agrees that decisions of this court, released after sentencing in this case, require that appellant’s sentence be vacated, and the case remanded for resentencing. See Wilson v. State, 580 So.2d 303 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991); Sellers v. State, 578 So.2d 339 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991). Accord Scott v. State, 574 So.2d 247 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991), jurisdiction accepted, decision pending, State v. Scott, 581 So.2d 1310 (Fla.1991); Lewis v. State, 574 So.2d 245 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991); Cabrera v. State, 576 So.2d 1358 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991).

Accordingly, appellant’s sentences are vacated and the cause is remanded for re-sentencing, pursuant to this court’s decision in Wilson and in Sellers. In addition, we certify that our resolution of the issue in this case is in direct conflict with decisions of the fourth and fifth district courts [1193]*1193of appeal in Carter v. State, 571 So.2d 520 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990); Flowers v. State, 567 So.2d 1055 (Fla. 5th DCA 1990); and Walker v. State, 546 So.2d 764 (Fla. 5th DCA 1989).

ERVIN and BARFIELD, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

JOANOS, Chief Judge.

Eric Paul Cadenhead appeals the sentences imposed upon him, based upon a sentencing guidelines point total calculated by multiplying the number of points assessed for legal constraint by the number of his felony convictions. The state agrees that decisions of this court, released after sentencing in this case, require that appellant’s sentence be vacated, and the case remanded for resentencing. See Wilson v. State, 580 So.2d 303 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991); Sellers v. State, 578 So.2d 339 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991). Accord Scott v. State, 574 So.2d 247 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991), jurisdiction accepted, decision pending, State v. Scott, 581 So.2d 1310 (Fla.1991); Lewis v. State, 574 So.2d 245 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991); Cabrera v. State, 576 So.2d 1358 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991).

Accordingly, appellant’s sentences are vacated and the cause is remanded for re-sentencing, pursuant to this court’s decision in Wilson and in Sellers. In addition, we certify that our resolution of the issue in this case is in direct conflict with decisions of the fourth and fifth district courts [1193]*1193of appeal in Carter v. State, 571 So.2d 520 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990); Flowers v. State, 567 So.2d 1055 (Fla. 5th DCA 1990); and Walker v. State, 546 So.2d 764 (Fla. 5th DCA 1989).

ERVIN and BARFIELD, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

585 So. 2d 1192, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 9687, 1991 WL 187304, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cadenhead-v-state-fladistctapp-1991.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack