Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Cade v. State

Cade v. State

116 So. 3d 613, 2013 WL 3235833, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 10309
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJune 28, 2013
DocketNo. 5D13-892
StatusPublished

This text of 116 So. 3d 613 (Cade v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cade v. State, 116 So. 3d 613, 2013 WL 3235833, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 10309 (Fla. Ct. App. 2013).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See Robertson v. State, 829 So.2d 901, 906-07 (Fla.2002) (stating that tipsy coachman doctrine allows an appellate court to affirm a ruling by the trial court that reached the right result, but for the wrong reason).

ORFINGER, C.J., PALMER and COHEN, JJ„ concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Robertson v. State
829 So. 2d 901 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2002)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
116 So. 3d 613, 2013 WL 3235833, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 10309, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cade-v-state-fladistctapp-2013.