Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Cade v. State

Cade v. State

116 So. 3d 613, 2013 WL 3235833, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 10309
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 28, 2013·No. No. 5D13-892·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See Robertson v. State, 829 So.2d 901, 906-07 (Fla.2002) (stating that tipsy coachman doctrine allows an appellate court to affirm a ruling by the trial court that reached the right result, but for the wrong reason).

ORFINGER, C.J., PALMER and COHEN, JJ„ concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cade v. State, 116 So. 3d 613, 2013 WL 3235833, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 10309 (Fla. Ct. App. 2013).

116 So. 3d 613 (Cade v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Robertson v. State
829 So. 2d 901 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2002)