Cade v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Cade v. State

767 So. 2d 628, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 12322, 2000 WL 1396773

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedSeptember 27, 2000

DocketNo. 3D00-5

StatusPublished

This text of 767 So. 2d 628 (Cade v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cade v. State, 767 So. 2d 628, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 12322, 2000 WL 1396773 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the trial court’s order denying the defendant’s motion to suppress, based upon its finding that the anonymous tip provided to the police, coupled with the officer’s observations of the defendant, established a reasonable suspicion to initially detain the defendant. See State v. Scott, 641 So.2d 517 (Fla. 3d DCA 1994). The officer then recovered the contraband that she observed the defendant conceal behind a wall, thus establishing the required probable cause for Cade’s arrest.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the trial court’s order denying the defendant’s motion to suppress, based upon its finding that the anonymous tip provided to the police, coupled with the officer’s observations of the defendant, established a reasonable suspicion to initially detain the defendant. See State v. Scott, 641 So.2d 517 (Fla. 3d DCA 1994). The officer then recovered the contraband that she observed the defendant conceal behind a wall, thus establishing the required probable cause for Cade’s arrest.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

767 So. 2d 628, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 12322, 2000 WL 1396773, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cade-v-state-fladistctapp-2000.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack