Cade v. State
767 So. 2d 628, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 12322, 2000 WL 1396773
Opinion
We affirm the trial court’s order denying the defendant’s motion to suppress, based upon its finding that the anonymous tip provided to the police, coupled with the officer’s observations of the defendant, established a reasonable suspicion to initially detain the defendant. See State v. Scott, 641 So.2d 517 (Fla. 3d DCA 1994). The officer then recovered the contraband that she observed the defendant conceal behind a wall, thus establishing the required probable cause for Cade’s arrest.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cade v. State, 767 So. 2d 628, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 12322, 2000 WL 1396773 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).
767 So. 2d 628 (Cade v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Scott
641 So. 2d 517 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1994)