Caddick v. Bostitch/Division of Textron

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Caddick v. Bostitch/Division of Textron

512 A.2d 126, 1986 R.I. LEXIS 575

CourtSupreme Court of Rhode Island

DecidedJuly 17, 1986

DocketNo. 85-570-M.P.

StatusPublished

This text of 512 A.2d 126 (Caddick v. Bostitch/Division of Textron) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Rhode Island primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Caddick v. Bostitch/Division of Textron, 512 A.2d 126, 1986 R.I. LEXIS 575 (R.I. 1986).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

This case is assigned to the show came calendar.

The respondent is directed to appear on a date to be assigned and show cause why the decree of the appellate commission should not be summarily quashed. In addition to the issues raised in the petitioner’s petition for certiorari, the parties should be prepared to discuss the question of whether or not the June 1985 amendment to § 28-35-9 specifically requiring the filing of a memorandum of agreement in cases such as this one warrants reversal of the appellate commission’s ruling.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

This case is assigned to the show came calendar.

The respondent is directed to appear on a date to be assigned and show cause why the decree of the appellate commission should not be summarily quashed. In addition to the issues raised in the petitioner’s petition for certiorari, the parties should be prepared to discuss the question of whether or not the June 1985 amendment to § 28-35-9 specifically requiring the filing of a memorandum of agreement in cases such as this one warrants reversal of the appellate commission’s ruling.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

512 A.2d 126, 1986 R.I. LEXIS 575, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/caddick-v-bostitchdivision-of-textron-ri-1986.