Caddick v. Bostitch/Division of Textron

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Caddick v. Bostitch/Division of Textron

512 A.2d 126, 1986 R.I. LEXIS 575

Supreme Court of Rhode Island·Decided July 17, 1986·No. No. 85-570-M.P.·Published

Opinion

ORDER

This case is assigned to the show came calendar.

The respondent is directed to appear on a date to be assigned and show cause why the decree of the appellate commission should not be summarily quashed. In addition to the issues raised in the petitioner’s petition for certiorari, the parties should be prepared to discuss the question of whether or not the June 1985 amendment to § 28-35-9 specifically requiring the filing of a memorandum of agreement in cases such as this one warrants reversal of the appellate commission’s ruling.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

This case is assigned to the show came calendar.

The respondent is directed to appear on a date to be assigned and show cause why the decree of the appellate commission should not be summarily quashed. In addition to the issues raised in the petitioner’s petition for certiorari, the parties should be prepared to discuss the question of whether or not the June 1985 amendment to § 28-35-9 specifically requiring the filing of a memorandum of agreement in cases such as this one warrants reversal of the appellate commission’s ruling.

Caddick v. Bostitch/Division of Textron, 512 A.2d 126, 1986 R.I. LEXIS 575 (R.I. 1986).

Pincite

512 A.2d 126 (Caddick v. Bostitch/Division of Textron) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.