CACI International, Inc. v. Pentagen Technologies International, Ltd.

Fourth Circuit

CACI International, Inc. v. Pentagen Technologies International, Ltd.

78 F. App'x 290

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided October 22, 2003·No. No. 02-2211·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Pentagen Technologies International appeals the district court’s order denying the motion to reopen a 1994 declaratory judgment as predicated on fraud. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See CACI Inti Inc. v. Pentagen Techs. Inti Ltd., No. CA-93-1631-A (E.D.Va. Aug. 30, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Pentagen Technologies International appeals the district court’s order denying the motion to reopen a 1994 declaratory judgment as predicated on fraud. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See CACI Inti Inc. v. Pentagen Techs. Inti Ltd., No. CA-93-1631-A (E.D.Va. Aug. 30, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

CACI International, Inc. v. Pentagen Technologies International, Ltd., 78 F. App'x 290 (4th Cir. 2003).

Pincite

78 F. App'x 290 (CACI International, Inc. v. Pentagen Technologies International, Ltd.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.