CACI International, Inc. v. Pentagen Technologies International, Ltd.
This text of 78 F. App'x 290 (CACI International, Inc. v. Pentagen Technologies International, Ltd.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Pentagen Technologies International appeals the district court’s order denying the motion to reopen a 1994 declaratory judgment as predicated on fraud. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See CACI Inti Inc. v. Pentagen Techs. Inti Ltd., No. CA-93-1631-A (E.D.Va. Aug. 30, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
78 F. App'x 290, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/caci-international-inc-v-pentagen-technologies-international-ltd-ca4-2003.