Cachat v. J.F. Guertin Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Cachat v. J.F. Guertin Co.

101 A.D.2d 772, 475 N.Y.S.2d 790, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 18412

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 17, 1984

StatusPublished

This text of 101 A.D.2d 772 (Cachat v. J.F. Guertin Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cachat v. J.F. Guertin Co., 101 A.D.2d 772, 475 N.Y.S.2d 790, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 18412 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1984).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Alfred J. Callahan, J.), entered on December 28,1982, unanimously modified, on the law and the facts, and a new trial ordered solely on the issue of damages, unless defendant J.F. Guertin Co., Inc., within 20 days after service upon its attorney of a copy of the order herein, with notice of entry, serves and files in the office of the clerk of the trial court a written stipulation consenting to increase the award to the plaintiffs to $400,000 and to the entry of an amended judgment in accordance therewith, and said judgment is otherwise affirmed, without costs. If said defendant so stipulates, the judgment, as so amended and increased, is affirmed, without costs and without disbursements. I After review of the record, we find the amount of damages assessed against defendant Guertin to be inadequate to the extent indicated. Concur — Kupferman, J. P., Sullivan, Silverman, Milonas and Kassal, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Alfred J. Callahan, J.), entered on December 28,1982, unanimously modified, on the law and the facts, and a new trial ordered solely on the issue of damages, unless defendant J.F. Guertin Co., Inc., within 20 days after service upon its attorney of a copy of the order herein, with notice of entry, serves and files in the office of the clerk of the trial court a written stipulation consenting to increase the award to the plaintiffs to $400,000 and to the entry of an amended judgment in accordance therewith, and said judgment is otherwise affirmed, without costs. If said defendant so stipulates, the judgment, as so amended and increased, is affirmed, without costs and without disbursements. I After review of the record, we find the amount of damages assessed against defendant Guertin to be inadequate to the extent indicated. Concur — Kupferman, J. P., Sullivan, Silverman, Milonas and Kassal, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

101 A.D.2d 772, 475 N.Y.S.2d 790, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 18412, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cachat-v-jf-guertin-co-nyappdiv-1984.