Caceres v. SEDANO'S SUPERMARKETS

36 So. 3d 919, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 8176, 2010 WL 2292784
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 9, 2010·No. 1D09-5962·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Osvaldo Caceres appeals an order of the Judge of Compensation Claims (JCC) enforcing a settlement agreement. Because the severance agreement and release, which the JCC concluded was a material part of the overall settlement agreement, provides that Caceres may revoke the agreement within seven days following the date of execution of the agreement, and because Caceres expressly rejected the settlement prior to executing the settlement documents, the JCC erred in finding the parties had reached a settlement of the workers’ compensation case. See Jones v. Miami-Dade Cmty. Coll., 933 So.2d 1221 (Fla. 1st DCA 2006).

REVERSED.

WOLF, KAHN, and ROBERTS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Caceres v. SEDANO'S SUPERMARKETS, 36 So. 3d 919, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 8176, 2010 WL 2292784 (Fla. Ct. App. 2010).

36 So. 3d 919 (Caceres v. SEDANO'S SUPERMARKETS) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Barnwell v. Miami-Dade County School Board
48 So. 3d 144 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2010)
McLean v. McLane Grocery Dist.
41 So. 3d 334 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2010)