Caceres v. SEDANO'S SUPERMARKETS
This text of 36 So. 3d 919 (Caceres v. SEDANO'S SUPERMARKETS) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Osvaldo Caceres appeals an order of the Judge of Compensation Claims (JCC) enforcing a settlement agreement. Because the severance agreement and release, which the JCC concluded was a material part of the overall settlement agreement, provides that Caceres may revoke the agreement within seven days following the date of execution of the agreement, and because Caceres expressly rejected the settlement prior to executing the settlement documents, the JCC erred in finding the parties had reached a settlement of the workers’ compensation case. See Jones v. Miami-Dade Cmty. Coll., 933 So.2d 1221 (Fla. 1st DCA 2006).
REVERSED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
36 So. 3d 919, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 8176, 2010 WL 2292784, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/caceres-v-sedanos-supermarkets-fladistctapp-2010.