Caceres v. Milton

498 So. 2d 576, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 2549, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 10925
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedDecember 2, 1986
DocketNo. 86-1183
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 498 So. 2d 576 (Caceres v. Milton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Caceres v. Milton, 498 So. 2d 576, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 2549, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 10925 (Fla. Ct. App. 1986).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Finding that the issue presented in this case is subject to the controlling authority of Russell v. A & L Development, Inc., 273 So.2d 439, 440 (Fla. 3d DCA), cert. denied, 279 So.2d 308 (Fla.1973), which holds that a party may not “attempt to receive a second satisfaction for the same wrong against a different party,” we affirm the Final Summary Judgment. See Weber v. Tam-Bay Realty, Inc., 490 So.2d 1371 (Fla. 2d DCA 1986).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Watkins v. State
498 So. 2d 576 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1986)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
498 So. 2d 576, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 2549, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 10925, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/caceres-v-milton-fladistctapp-1986.