Caceres v. Milton
498 So. 2d 576, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 2549, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 10925
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 2, 1986·No. No. 86-1183·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
Finding that the issue presented in this case is subject to the controlling authority of Russell v. A & L Development, Inc., 273 So.2d 439, 440 (Fla. 3d DCA), cert. denied, 279 So.2d 308 (Fla.1973), which holds that a party may not “attempt to receive a second satisfaction for the same wrong against a different party,” we affirm the Final Summary Judgment. See Weber v. Tam-Bay Realty, Inc., 490 So.2d 1371 (Fla. 2d DCA 1986).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Caceres v. Milton, 498 So. 2d 576, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 2549, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 10925 (Fla. Ct. App. 1986).
498 So. 2d 576 (Caceres v. Milton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Watkins v. State
498 So. 2d 576 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1986)