Caceres v. Florida Department of Labor & Employment Security

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Caceres v. Florida Department of Labor & Employment Security

414 So. 2d 628, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 20204

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJune 1, 1982

DocketNo. 81-2137

StatusPublished

This text of 414 So. 2d 628 (Caceres v. Florida Department of Labor & Employment Security) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Caceres v. Florida Department of Labor & Employment Security, 414 So. 2d 628, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 20204 (Fla. Ct. App. 1982).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant seeks reversal of an order of the Unemployment Appeals Commission which affirmed the decision of the Appeals Referee that held appellant was not entitled to benefits on the ground that he failed to report to the claim office as required by the Florida Unemployment Compensation Law.

We have carefully considered appellant’s contentions in the light of the record on appeal and the briefs and have concluded that no reversible error has been demonstrated. There is competent substantial evidence in the record and a substantial reasonable basis in the law to support the findings and conclusions of the Appeals Referee, adopted by the Commission, that claimant is ineligible for benefits for failure to meet reporting requirements, within the meaning of section 443.091(1)(a) Florida Statutes (1980). See Bagwell Lumber Company v. Florida Department of Commerce, 353 So.2d 1261 (Fla.2d DCA 1978). Therefore the order appealed is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appellant seeks reversal of an order of the Unemployment Appeals Commission which affirmed the decision of the Appeals Referee that held appellant was not entitled to benefits on the ground that he failed to report to the claim office as required by the Florida Unemployment Compensation Law.

We have carefully considered appellant’s contentions in the light of the record on appeal and the briefs and have concluded that no reversible error has been demonstrated. There is competent substantial evidence in the record and a substantial reasonable basis in the law to support the findings and conclusions of the Appeals Referee, adopted by the Commission, that claimant is ineligible for benefits for failure to meet reporting requirements, within the meaning of section 443.091(1)(a) Florida Statutes (1980). See Bagwell Lumber Company v. Florida Department of Commerce, 353 So.2d 1261 (Fla.2d DCA 1978). Therefore the order appealed is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

414 So. 2d 628, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 20204, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/caceres-v-florida-department-of-labor-employment-security-fladistctapp-1982.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack