Cacciatore v. State

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Cacciatore v. State

4 A.D.2d 928, 167 N.Y.S.2d 454, 1957 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4127

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 30, 1957

DocketClaim No. 32776

StatusPublished

This text of 4 A.D.2d 928 (Cacciatore v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cacciatore v. State, 4 A.D.2d 928, 167 N.Y.S.2d 454, 1957 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4127 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1957).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment insofar as appealed from modified on the law in accordance with the memorandum and as modified affirmed, with costs to the claimant. Appeal from order dismissed as academic. Memorandum: The judgment insofar as appealed from should be modified to conform with the rule laid down in Vescera V. State of New York (3 A D 2d 644). All concur. (Appeal from part of a judgment and order of the Court of Claims awarding claimant an allowance of interest on an award for appropriation of realty. The order denied defendant’s motion to amend the decision in respect to computation of interest and claimant’s cross motion to amend the decision.) Present — Vaughan, J. P., Kimball, Williams, Bastow and Goldman, JJ. [5 Misc 2d 841.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment insofar as appealed from modified on the law in accordance with the memorandum and as modified affirmed, with costs to the claimant. Appeal from order dismissed as academic. Memorandum: The judgment insofar as appealed from should be modified to conform with the rule laid down in Vescera V. State of New York (3 A D 2d 644). All concur. (Appeal from part of a judgment and order of the Court of Claims awarding claimant an allowance of interest on an award for appropriation of realty. The order denied defendant’s motion to amend the decision in respect to computation of interest and claimant’s cross motion to amend the decision.) Present — Vaughan, J. P., Kimball, Williams, Bastow and Goldman, JJ. [5 Misc 2d 841.]

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

4 A.D.2d 928, 167 N.Y.S.2d 454, 1957 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4127, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cacciatore-v-state-nyappdiv-1957.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack