Caccese v. Liebherr Container Cranes, Ltd.

2017 NY Slip Op 2621, 149 A.D.3d 687, 49 N.Y.S.3d 634
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Caccese v. Liebherr Container Cranes, Ltd.. Read the opinion of the Court — 149 A.D.3d 688
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 5, 2017·No. 2014-02642·Published

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant Liebherr Container Cranes, Ltd., appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Maltese, J.), dated January 16, 2014, as denied its motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against it, and the defendant Liebherr Cranes, Inc., appeals from the same order.

Ordered that the appeal by the defendant Liebherr Cranes, Inc., is dismissed, without costs or disbursements, as that party is not aggrieved by the order appealed from (see CPLR 5511) and, in any event, that appeal has been abandoned (see 22 NYCRR 670.8 [e]); and it is further,

Ordered that the appeal by the defendant Liebherr Container Cranes, Ltd., is dismissed as academic, without costs or disbursements.

The appeal by the defendant Liebherr Container Cranes, Ltd., must be dismissed as academic in light of our determination in Caccese v Liebherr Container Cranes, Ltd. (149 AD3d *688 688 [2017] [decided herewith]).

Leventhal, J.P., Sgroi, Hinds-Radix and LaSalle, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Caccese v. Liebherr Container Cranes, Ltd., 2017 NY Slip Op 2621, 149 A.D.3d 687, 49 N.Y.S.3d 634 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2017).

2017 NY Slip Op 2621 (Caccese v. Liebherr Container Cranes, Ltd.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.