Caccamo v. Garlock, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Caccamo v. Garlock, Inc.

214 A.D.2d 483, 625 N.Y.S.2d 905, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4560

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 25, 1995

StatusPublished

This text of 214 A.D.2d 483 (Caccamo v. Garlock, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Caccamo v. Garlock, Inc., 214 A.D.2d 483, 625 N.Y.S.2d 905, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4560 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Helen Freedman, J.), entered on or about January 12, 1995, which denied defendant-appellant’s motion for summary judgment, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

For the reasons stated in Reid v Georgia-Pacific Corp. (212 AD2d 462) and Salerno v Garlock Inc. (212 AD2d 463), defendant’s motion for summary judgment was properly denied. Concur—Sullivan, J. P., Rosenberger, Wallach, Kupferman and Tom, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Helen Freedman, J.), entered on or about January 12, 1995, which denied defendant-appellant’s motion for summary judgment, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

For the reasons stated in Reid v Georgia-Pacific Corp. (212 AD2d 462) and Salerno v Garlock Inc. (212 AD2d 463), defendant’s motion for summary judgment was properly denied. Concur—Sullivan, J. P., Rosenberger, Wallach, Kupferman and Tom, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

214 A.D.2d 483, 625 N.Y.S.2d 905, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4560, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/caccamo-v-garlock-inc-nyappdiv-1995.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack