Cacace v. Associated Technicians, Inc.

144 So. 2d 82
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 11, 1962·No. No. 62-277·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

BARKDULL, Judge.

Petitioner [plaintiff in the trial court], by writ of certiorari, seeks review of an order of the trial judge requiring that she permit her deposition to be taken out of the presence of a plaintiff in a companion suit. The order also provides that “ * * * said deposition when taken shall be complete for use in either case.” [“Either case” is the companion case.]

The writ of certiorari is denied; no abuse of discretion is shown in prohibiting the attendance at the taking of a deposition of persons not parties to the instant cause. Of course, the petitioner would be entitled to be present at the taking of any deposition which is noticed in her case. 1.24(b), Florida Rules of Civil Procedure, 30 F.S.A. It not appearing that the trial court is departing from the essential requirements of the law, the petition for writ of certiorari is denied.

Certiorari denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cacace v. Associated Technicians, Inc., 144 So. 2d 82 (Fla. Ct. App. 1962).

144 So. 2d 82 (Cacace v. Associated Technicians, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ferrigno v. Yoder
495 So. 2d 886 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1986)