Cacace v. Associated Technicians, Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Cacace v. Associated Technicians, Inc.

144 So. 2d 82

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedSeptember 11, 1962

DocketNo. 62-277

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 144 So. 2d 82 (Cacace v. Associated Technicians, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cacace v. Associated Technicians, Inc., 144 So. 2d 82 (Fla. Ct. App. 1962).

Pincite

Opinion

BARKDULL, Judge.

Petitioner [plaintiff in the trial court], by writ of certiorari, seeks review of an order of the trial judge requiring that she permit her deposition to be taken out of the presence of a plaintiff in a companion suit. The order also provides that “ * * * said deposition when taken shall be complete for use in either case.” [“Either case” is the companion case.]

The writ of certiorari is denied; no abuse of discretion is shown in prohibiting the attendance at the taking of a deposition of persons not parties to the instant cause. Of course, the petitioner would be entitled to be present at the taking of any deposition which is noticed in her case. 1.24(b), Florida Rules of Civil Procedure, 30 F.S.A. It not appearing that the trial court is departing from the essential requirements of the law, the petition for writ of certiorari is denied.

Certiorari denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BARKDULL, Judge.

Petitioner [plaintiff in the trial court], by writ of certiorari, seeks review of an order of the trial judge requiring that she permit her deposition to be taken out of the presence of a plaintiff in a companion suit. The order also provides that “ * * * said deposition when taken shall be complete for use in either case.” [“Either case” is the companion case.]

The writ of certiorari is denied; no abuse of discretion is shown in prohibiting the attendance at the taking of a deposition of persons not parties to the instant cause. Of course, the petitioner would be entitled to be present at the taking of any deposition which is noticed in her case. 1.24(b), Florida Rules of Civil Procedure, 30 F.S.A. It not appearing that the trial court is departing from the essential requirements of the law, the petition for writ of certiorari is denied.

Certiorari denied.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

144 So. 2d 82, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cacace-v-associated-technicians-inc-fladistctapp-1962.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack