Cabriolet Porsche Audi, Inc. v. De Maria Porsche Audi, Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Cabriolet Porsche Audi, Inc. v. De Maria Porsche Audi, Inc.

379 So. 2d 1010, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 23344

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 12, 1980·No. No. 79-955·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from a judgment of the Circuit Court of Dade County, Florida, awarding attorney fees to defendant below for services rendered by its counsel.

Appellant contends that the award of $65,000.00 was excessive and an abuse of the trial court’s discretion. We have considered appellant’s point on appeal in the light of the record on appeal, briefs and argument of counsel and have concluded that no clear abuse of discretion appears. Herzog v. Herzog, 346 So.2d 56 (Fla.1976); Greenberg v. Greenberg, 289 So.2d 439 (Fla. 3d DCA 1974). Thereupon the judgment appealed is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from a judgment of the Circuit Court of Dade County, Florida, awarding attorney fees to defendant below for services rendered by its counsel.

Appellant contends that the award of $65,000.00 was excessive and an abuse of the trial court’s discretion. We have considered appellant’s point on appeal in the light of the record on appeal, briefs and argument of counsel and have concluded that no clear abuse of discretion appears. Herzog v. Herzog, 346 So.2d 56 (Fla.1976); Greenberg v. Greenberg, 289 So.2d 439 (Fla. 3d DCA 1974). Thereupon the judgment appealed is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Cabriolet Porsche Audi, Inc. v. De Maria Porsche Audi, Inc., 379 So. 2d 1010, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 23344 (Fla. Ct. App. 1980).

Pincite

379 So. 2d 1010 (Cabriolet Porsche Audi, Inc. v. De Maria Porsche Audi, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related