Cabriolet Porsche Audi, Inc. v. De Maria Porsche Audi, Inc.

379 So. 2d 1010, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 23344
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedFebruary 12, 1980
DocketNo. 79-955
StatusPublished

This text of 379 So. 2d 1010 (Cabriolet Porsche Audi, Inc. v. De Maria Porsche Audi, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cabriolet Porsche Audi, Inc. v. De Maria Porsche Audi, Inc., 379 So. 2d 1010, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 23344 (Fla. Ct. App. 1980).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from a judgment of the Circuit Court of Dade County, Florida, awarding attorney fees to defendant below for services rendered by its counsel.

Appellant contends that the award of $65,000.00 was excessive and an abuse of the trial court’s discretion. We have considered appellant’s point on appeal in the light of the record on appeal, briefs and argument of counsel and have concluded that no clear abuse of discretion appears. Herzog v. Herzog, 346 So.2d 56 (Fla.1976); Greenberg v. Greenberg, 289 So.2d 439 (Fla. 3d DCA 1974). Thereupon the judgment appealed is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Herzog v. Herzog
346 So. 2d 56 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1977)
Greenberg v. Greenberg
289 So. 2d 439 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1974)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
379 So. 2d 1010, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 23344, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cabriolet-porsche-audi-inc-v-de-maria-porsche-audi-inc-fladistctapp-1980.