Cabrera-Valadez v. Gonzales

224 F. App'x 668
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided March 16, 2007·No. No. 06-73317·Published

Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Emma Ana Cabrera-Valadez petitions for review of a Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) decision finding her removable under 8 U.S.C. § 1182(a)(6)(C)(ii) for falsely representing herself as a citizen of the United States.

Petitioner was ordered to show cause why the petition for review should not be summarily denied. In her response, petitioner admits that she falsely represented herself to being a United States citizen, as she admitted before the BIA, but asserts that she should be eligible for a waiver. The charge of inadmissibility under 8 U.S.C. § 1182(a)(6)(C)(ii), however, is not waivable. See Pichardo v. INS, 216 F.3d 1198, 1201 (9th Cir.2000). Accordingly, the petition for review is denied.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cabrera-Valadez v. Gonzales, 224 F. App'x 668 (9th Cir. 2007).

224 F. App'x 668 (Cabrera-Valadez v. Gonzales) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Pichardo v. Immigration & Naturalization Service
216 F.3d 1198 (Ninth Circuit, 2000)