Cabrera v. State
640 So. 2d 1254, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 8103, 1994 WL 440581
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Cabrera v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 8929 →
Opinion
Defendant appeals his sentence after being found guilty of violating his probation. We agree that the sentence imposed is illegal. The flaw in the flue is in the failure to credit defendant with time he had served on probation before the violation. The ease is therefore indistinguishable from Reed v. State, 616 So.2d 592 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993).
On remand we direct the trial judge to give defendant credit for 530 days served as to both counts.
REVERSED AND REMANDED WITH DIRECTIONS.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cabrera v. State, 640 So. 2d 1254, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 8103, 1994 WL 440581 (Fla. Ct. App. 1994).
640 So. 2d 1254 (Cabrera v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Reed v. State
616 So. 2d 592 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1993)