Cabrera v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

United States Court of Federal Claims·Decided April 3, 2020·No. 13-598·Unpublished

Opinion

In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF THE SPECIAL MASTERS Filed: March 11, 2020

* * * * * * * * * * * * * ERIC P. CABRERA and CAROL * CABRERA, natural parents and guardians * of L.C., a minor, * UNPUBLISHED * Petitioners, * No. 13-598V * v. * Special Master Gowen * SECRETARY OF HEALTH * Damages; Off-Table Injury; AND HUMAN SERVICES, * Diphtheria-Tetanus-Acellular-Pertussis * (“DTaP”); Juvenile Idiopathic Respondent. * Arthritis (“JIA”). * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Sylvia Chin-Caplan, Law Office of Sylvia Chin-Caplan, Boston, MA, for petitioners. Darryl R. Whishard, United States Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.

DECISION ON DAMAGES1

On August 21, 2013, Eric and Carol Cabrera (“petitioners”), on behalf of their minor child L.C., filed a petition under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (“Vaccine Act” or the “Program”).2 Petition (ECF No. 1). Petitioners alleged that as a result of receiving a diphtheria-tetanus-acellular pertussis (“DTaP”) vaccine on August 30, 2010, L.C. developed juvenile idiopathic arthritis (“JIA”). Id. at ¶ 3-4. Respondent recommended against awarding compensation. Respondent’s Report (ECF No. 27). Each party submitted expert reports. An entitlement hearing was held on November 19, 2015. Transcript (ECF No. 73). Following the

1 Pursuant to the E-Government Act of 2002, see 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012), because this opinion contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I am required to post it on the website of the United States Court of Federal Claims. The court’s website is at http://www.uscfc.uscourts.gov/aggregator/sources/7. This means the opinion will be available to anyone with access to the Internet. Before the opinion is posted on the court’s website, each party has 14 days to file a motion requesting redaction “of any information furnished by that party: (1) that is a trade secret or commercial or financial in substance and is privileged or confidential; or (2) that includes medical files or similar files, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of privacy.” Vaccine Rule 18(b). An objecting party must provide the court with a proposed redacted version of the opinion. Id. If neither party files a motion for redaction within 14 days, the opinion will be posted on the court’s website without any changes. Id.

2 The National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program is set forth in Part 2 of the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755, codified as amended, 42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-1 to -34 (2012) (Vaccine Act or the Act). All citations in this decision to individual sections of the Vaccine Act are to 42 U.S.C.A. § 300aa. submission of post-hearing briefs, on January 12, 2017, the undersigned issued a ruling finding that petitioners were entitled to compensation on behalf of L.C. based on a showing of causation- in-fact. Ruling on Entitlement (ECF No. 82).

On September 10, 2019, I granted petitioners’ motion for relief from judgment (ECF No. 159). I withdrew the original decision on damages filed on May 28, 2019 (ECF No. 154), which was based on a previous proffer filed on May 21, 2019 (ECF No. 153). I also directed the Clerk to withdraw the judgment entered on May 31, 2019 (ECF No. 157).

On March 11, 2020, respondent filed a proffer on an award of compensation, which indicates petitioners’ agreement to compensation on the terms set forth therein. Proffer (ECF No. 175). The proffer is attached hereto as Appendix A.

Consistent with the terms of the proffer, I hereby award the following compensation for all damages that would be available under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a):

1) A lump sum payment of $209,559.44 (representing compensation for pain and suffering ($200,000.00) and life care expenses for Year One ($9,559.44), in the form of a check payable to petitioners as guardian(s)/ conservator(s) of L.C., for the benefit of L.C.

2) A lump sum payment of $2,062.75, representing compensation for past un- reimbursable expenses, in the form of a check payable to petitioners, Eric. P. Cabrera and Carol Cabrera.

3) A lump sum payment of $8,145.03, representing compensation for satisfaction of a Colorado Department of Health Care Policy and Financing Medicaid lien, payable jointly to petitioners and Colorado Department of Health Care Policy and Financing, and mailed to:

Colorado Department of Health Care Policy and Financing ATTN: Erika L. Herrera Third Party Liability & Recoveries Section 1570 Grant Street Denver, CO 80203 State ID No.: P493554 Tax ID No.: XX-XXXXXXX

Petitioners agree to endorse this payment to Colorado Department of Health Care Policy and Financing.

4) An amount sufficient to purchase the annuity contract, subject to the conditions described in the proffer.

2 Accordingly, the Clerk of Court SHALL ENTER JUDGMENT in accordance with the terms of the proffer and this decision.3

IT IS SO ORDERED. s/Thomas L. Gowen Thomas L. Gowen Special Master

3 Entry of judgment is expedited by each party’s filing notice renouncing the right to seek review. Vaccine Rule 11(a).

3 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS __________________________________________ ) ERIC P. CABRERA and CAROL ) CABRERA, as natural parents and ) Guardians of L.C., a minor, ) ) Petitioners, ) ) v. ) No. 13-598V ) Special Master Gowen SECRETARY OF THE DEPARTMENT OF ) HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, ) ) Respondent. ) __________________________________________)

PROFFER ON AWARD OF COMPENSATION

I. Procedural History

On August 21, 2013, Eric P. Cabrera and Carol Cabrera (“petitioners”) filed a petition for

compensation on behalf of their minor child, L.C., under the National Childhood Vaccine Injury

Act of 1986, as amended, 42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-1 et seq. (“Vaccine Act”). Petitioners allege that,

as a result of receiving the diphtheria-tetanus-acellular pertussis (“DTaP”) vaccine on August 30,

2010, L.C. developed juvenile idiopathic arthritis (“JIA”). On September 26, 2014, respondent

filed his Vaccine Rule 4(c) report, denying that entitlement to compensation was appropriate in

this case. On January 12, 2017, the Special Master issued a ruling on entitlement, finding that

petitioners were entitled to compensation for L.C.

On September 10, 2019, the Special Master granted petitioners’ Motion for Relief from

Judgment. He withdrew his Decision on Damages, entered on May 28, 2019 (ECF No. 154) that

was based on a previous Proffer, filed on May 21, 2019 (ECF No. 153). He also directed the

Clerk to withdraw the judgment, entered on May 31, 2019 (ECF No. 157).

-1- I. Items of Compensation

A. Life Care Items

The respondent engaged life care planner, Laura Fox, MSN, BSN, RN, CDDN, CLCP,

and petitioners engaged ReEntry Rehabilitation Services, Inc., to provide an estimation of L.C.’s

future vaccine-injury related needs. For the purposes of this proffer, the term “vaccine related”

is as described in the Special Master’s Ruling on Entitlement. All items of compensation

identified in the life care plan are supported by the evidence, and are illustrated by the chart

entitled Appendix A: Items of Compensation for L.C., attached hereto as Tab A. 1 Petitioners

agree.

B.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cabrera v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, (uscfc 2020).

Cabrera v. Secretary of Health and Human Services (Cabrera v. Secretary of Health and Human Services) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

§ 300aa
42 U.S.C. § 300aa
§ 300aa-1
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-1
§ 300aa-15
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a)(3)(B)
Purposes
44 U.S.C. § 3501
§ 300a
42 U.S.C. § 300a