Cabrera v. Brown
This text of 520 F. App'x 210 (Cabrera v. Brown) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Molli Trish Cabrera and Darlene Elizabeth Carter (“Appellants”) appeal the magistrate judge’s sanctions order and the order granting summary judgment in favor of Donta Cornelius Brown and Western Express, Incorporated in Appellants’ civil action.
AFFIRMED.
The parties consented to the exercise of jurisdiction by the magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) (2006).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
520 F. App'x 210, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cabrera-v-brown-ca4-2013.