Cabot v. Corcoran
130 N.E.2d 699, 333 Mass. 769
Opinion
Decree affirmed with double costs against the appellant. This is an appeal from a decree of the court below dismissing as intended for the purpose of delay an appeal entered in that court from a decree after rescript from this court. Cabot v. Corcoran, 332 Mass. 44. The decree after rescript carefully followed the rescript of this court and there was no error in the decree dismissing the appeal from it.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cabot v. Corcoran, 130 N.E.2d 699, 333 Mass. 769 (Mass. 1955).
130 N.E.2d 699 (Cabot v. Corcoran) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
People Ex Rel. Rogers v. Elrod
340 N.E.2d 598 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1975)
Snell v. Ruppert
541 P.2d 1042 (Wyoming Supreme Court, 1975)
Commonwealth v. Benoit
196 N.E.2d 228 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1964)
Corcoran v. Commonwealth
138 N.E.2d 348 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1956)