CABLE VISION OF CENTRAL FLA. v. Armes
This text of 629 So. 2d 274 (CABLE VISION OF CENTRAL FLA. v. Armes) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
CABLE VISION OF CENTRAL FLORIDA and Aetna Casualty & Surety Company, Appellants,
v.
Cynthia ARMES, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Eric A. Schultz of Chelius & Murphy, George A. Vaka of Fowler, White, Gillen, Boggs, Villareal & Banker, Tampa, for appellants.
Craig M. Spanjers and J. Mason Wines of Stanley, Wines, Bennett, Murphy, Spanjers & Helms, Winter Haven, for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
We reverse that portion of the compensation order which includes in the computation of AWW the fringe benefits of sick and vacation pay, personal days, employer contributions to pension plan, and free cable television, and remand for a recalculation of AWW. Vegas v. Globe Security, 627 So.2d 76 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993); Rudd Sod Co. v. Reeves, 595 So.2d 254 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992).
SMITH and KAHN, JJ., and SHIVERS, Senior Judge, concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
629 So. 2d 274, 1993 WL 521223, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cable-vision-of-central-fla-v-armes-fladistctapp-1993.