Cable v. State
687 So. 2d 975, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 1226, 22 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 459
This text of 687 So. 2d 975 (Cable v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Cable v. State, 687 So. 2d 975, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 1226, 22 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 459 (Fla. Ct. App. 1997).
Opinion
We reverse and remand for a new trial. It was error to admit trial testimony as to a horizontal gaze nystagmus test performed by the arresting officer without laying a predicate for its admission as scientific evidence. See State v. Meador, 674 So.2d 826 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996); Melvin v. State, 677 So.2d 1317 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
State v. Meador
674 So. 2d 826 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1996)
Melvin v. State
677 So. 2d 1317 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1996)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
687 So. 2d 975, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 1226, 22 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 459, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cable-v-state-fladistctapp-1997.