Cable v. Primary Health Concepts

North Carolina Industrial Commission·Decided October 31, 2000·No. I.C. No. 824951.·Published

Opinion

After careful review of plaintiffs motion, defendants response, the Full Commission Opinion and Award filed August 28, 2000 and the evidence of record including the deposition of Dr. Gudeman, plaintiffs motion is hereby Denied. Although Dr. Gudeman indicated the need for a functional capacity evaluation, he also indicated that plaintiff was at maximum medical improvement and there were no permanent restrictions. In a denied claim, plaintiff has the burden of proving the extent of disability.Hilliard v. Apex Cabinet Co., 305 N.C. 593, 290 S.E.2d 682 (1982). Under the circumstances of this case and considering the totality of the medical evidence, plaintiffs need for a functional capacity evaluation does not indicate further temporary total disability. The extent of total disability proven by plaintiff ends on February 8, 1999 when she reached maximum medical improvement.

S/_______________ DIANNE C. SELLERS COMMISSIONER

CONCURRING:

S/_____________ THOMAS J. BOLCH COMMISSIONER

S/______________________ LAURA KRANIFELD MAVRETIC COMMISSIONER

DCS/bjp

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cable v. Primary Health Concepts, (N.C. Super. Ct. 2000).

Cable v. Primary Health Concepts (Cable v. Primary Health Concepts) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hilliard v. Apex Cabinet Co.
290 S.E.2d 682 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1982)