Cable v. Coates

36 Kan. 191
CourtSupreme Court of Kansas
DecidedJanuary 15, 1887
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 36 Kan. 191 (Cable v. Coates) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Kansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cable v. Coates, 36 Kan. 191 (kan 1887).

Opinion

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Horton, C. J.:

The defendant below, (plaintiff in error,) claimed upon the trial the land in controversy, under a tax deed issued to him September 5, 1881. The date of the tax sale was September 4, 1878. The redemption notice and list, which were published, stated the land was to be redeemed on or before September 5, 1881.

It was decided in English v. Williamson, 34 Kas. 212, that where real estate has been sold for taxes, the owner has, under any circumstances, at least three years’ time from the day of sale, and any time before the execution of the tax deed, within which to redeem his land from the taxes; and it was further decided that the day on which the land is sold must be excluded from the computation of the three years’ time; therefore, plaintiff below, (defendant in error,) had all of September 5, 1881, within which to redeem his land. No moment of time can be said to be after a given day until that day has expired. But the tax deed in this case was issued on September 5, 1881, and filed for record at 2 o’clock p. m. of that day; the deed, therefore, was prematurely issued.

This action was commenced on January 29, 1884; so no question of limitation is involved. (Comp. Laws of 1879, ch. 107, § 141.) The tax deed, having been prematurely is[196]*196sued, is clearly voidable, and was properly held by the trial court insufficient to vest in the grantee thereof an absolute estate in fee simple to the land therein described.

Before the plaintiff below can obtain possession he must pay the taxes, interest, and penalties — that is, redeem the land. The judgment of the district court will be affirmed.

All the Justices concurring.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Styles v. Dickey
134 N.W. 702 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 1912)
Flickinger v. Cornwell
117 N.W. 1039 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 1908)
Pierce v. Adams
93 P. 594 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1908)
Hicks v. Nelson
25 P. 565 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1891)
Rogers v. Coates
38 Kan. 232 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1888)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
36 Kan. 191, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cable-v-coates-kan-1887.