Cabildo Construction Co. v. 3838 Ridgelake Partnership
This text of 587 So. 2d 686 (Cabildo Construction Co. v. 3838 Ridgelake Partnership) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In re 3838 Ridgelake Prtn.; Hoffman, David R.; Scalco, Anthony N.; Gonsoulin, [687]*687Thomas P.; MeMillen, Larry B.; Cavallino, Marvin V.; — Defendant(s); applying for writ of certiorari and/or review; to the Court of Appeal, Fifth Circuit, No. 90-CA-0671; Parish of Jefferson, 24th Judicial District Court, Div. “B”, No. 363-714.
Prior report: La.App., 579 So.2d 1063.
Writ granted in part; denied in part. The application of 3838 Ridgelake Partnership, et al., defendants and plaintiffs-in-reconvention, is granted to the limited extent of reversing that part of the court of appeal decision which reversed the district court’s denial of defendants-in-reconvention’s exception of res judicata with reservation of the right to reurge the exception at trial. As conceded and affirmatively asserted by defendants-in-reconvention, there are claims asserted in the reconven-tional demand which were not compromised in the settlement agreement. The district court’s ruling contemplates and will allow a determination of which claims asserted in the reconventional demand were settled and compromised and are barred by res judicata, as those claims are presented at trial. Otherwise, the application is denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
587 So. 2d 686, 1991 La. LEXIS 2817, 1991 WL 216711, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cabildo-construction-co-v-3838-ridgelake-partnership-la-1991.