Cabezas v. Scott

D. Arizona

Cabezas v. Scott

717 F. Supp. 696, 1989 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9983, 1989 WL 96937

CourtDistrict Court, D. Arizona

DecidedJanuary 27, 1989

DocketCIV 88-457 GLO-RMB

StatusPublished

Cited by7 cases

This text of 717 F. Supp. 696 (Cabezas v. Scott) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. Arizona primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cabezas v. Scott, 717 F. Supp. 696, 1989 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9983, 1989 WL 96937 (D. Ariz. 1989).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

BILBY, Chief Judge.

Petitioner is currently in the custody of the Federal Bureau of Prisons. The Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS) has issued a Form 1-247 “Immigration Detainer&emdash;Notice of Action by Immigration and Naturalization Service” and a Form 1-221 “Order to Show Cause and Notice of Hearing.” These documents advise petitioner and the Bureau of Prisons of petitioner’s deportability and request thirty days notice of petitioner’s release. No arrest warrant has been issued. This court is of the opinion that the documents issued do not serve to place petitioner within the custody of INS. Campillo v. Sullivan, 853 F.2d 593 (8th Cir.1988), Fernandez-Collado v. INS, 644 F.Supp. 741 (D.Conn.1986). 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a) is, therefore, inapplicable to petitioner.

The court further concludes that Section 701 of the Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986, Pub.L. 99-603, codified at 8 U.S.C. § 1252(i), was intended to address the balance of state versus federal responsibility for incarcerated aliens subject to deportation, rather than for the benefit of deportable aliens. The statute, therefore, does not provide petitioner with a private right of action. Cort v. Ash, 422 U.S. 66, 95 S.Ct. 2080, 45 L.Ed.2d 26 (1975); Universities Research Association, Inc. v. Coutu, 450 U.S. 754, 101 S.Ct. 1451, 67 L.Ed.2d 662 (1981).

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that respondents’ Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

BILBY, Chief Judge.

Petitioner is currently in the custody of the Federal Bureau of Prisons. The Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS) has issued a Form 1-247 “Immigration Detainer&emdash;Notice of Action by Immigration and Naturalization Service” and a Form 1-221 “Order to Show Cause and Notice of Hearing.” These documents advise petitioner and the Bureau of Prisons of petitioner’s deportability and request thirty days notice of petitioner’s release. No arrest warrant has been issued. This court is of the opinion that the documents issued do not serve to place petitioner within the custody of INS. Campillo v. Sullivan, 853 F.2d 593 (8th Cir.1988), Fernandez-Collado v. INS, 644 F.Supp. 741 (D.Conn.1986). 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a) is, therefore, inapplicable to petitioner.

The court further concludes that Section 701 of the Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986, Pub.L. 99-603, codified at 8 U.S.C. § 1252(i), was intended to address the balance of state versus federal responsibility for incarcerated aliens subject to deportation, rather than for the benefit of deportable aliens. The statute, therefore, does not provide petitioner with a private right of action. Cort v. Ash, 422 U.S. 66, 95 S.Ct. 2080, 45 L.Ed.2d 26 (1975); Universities Research Association, Inc. v. Coutu, 450 U.S. 754, 101 S.Ct. 1451, 67 L.Ed.2d 662 (1981).

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that respondents’ Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

717 F. Supp. 696, 1989 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9983, 1989 WL 96937, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cabezas-v-scott-azd-1989.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack