Cabezas v. City of New York

184 A.D.2d 240
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 4, 1992·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Stanley L. Sklar, J.), entered July 3, 1991, which granted petitioners’ motion for leave to file a late notice of claim against the municipal defendant, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

In the circumstances we find it to have been a reasonable exercise of discretion for the court to grant the application to file two months beyond the 90-day period (see, Cruz v New York City Hous. Auth., 178 AD2d 291). Petitioner Juan Cabe[241] zas was severely incapacitated, by the severance of his right arm. Further, we note that the defendant Housing Authority had agents and employees at the accident site who investigated and/or filed detailed reports allowing ample opportunity to examine the insulation mulching machine in question. Concur — Ellerin, J. P., Kupferman, Ross, Asch and Kassal, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cabezas v. City of New York, 184 A.D.2d 240 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1992).

184 A.D.2d 240 (Cabezas v. City of New York) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Gadson v. New York City Housing Authority
196 A.D.2d 585 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1993)
Ippolito v. City of Buffalo
195 A.D.2d 983 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1993)