Cabeza v. Hoffman Sootin & Erro DDS PA

877 So. 2d 25, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 7375, 2004 WL 1162233
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMay 26, 2004
DocketNo. 3D03-2726
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 877 So. 2d 25 (Cabeza v. Hoffman Sootin & Erro DDS PA) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cabeza v. Hoffman Sootin & Erro DDS PA, 877 So. 2d 25, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 7375, 2004 WL 1162233 (Fla. Ct. App. 2004).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Because the record evidence supports the finding that the appellant/claimant was disqualified from receiving benefits because she voluntarily left her employment without good cause attributable to her employer, we affirm. See § 443.101(l)(a), Fla. Stat. (2001); Sollecito v. Hollywood Lincoln Mercury, Inc., 450 So.2d 928 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984); Perez v. Dep’t of Labor & Employment Sec., 377 So.2d 806 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979); Uniweld Prods., Inc. v. Indus. Relations Comm’n, 277 So.2d 827 (Fla. 4th DCA 1973).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Yanes v. State
877 So. 2d 25 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2004)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
877 So. 2d 25, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 7375, 2004 WL 1162233, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cabeza-v-hoffman-sootin-erro-dds-pa-fladistctapp-2004.