Cabeza v. Hoffman Sootin & Erro DDS PA
877 So. 2d 25, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 7375, 2004 WL 1162233
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 26, 2004·No. No. 3D03-2726·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
Because the record evidence supports the finding that the appellant/claimant was disqualified from receiving benefits because she voluntarily left her employment without good cause attributable to her employer, we affirm. See § 443.101(l)(a), Fla. Stat. (2001); Sollecito v. Hollywood Lincoln Mercury, Inc., 450 So.2d 928 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984); Perez v. Dep’t of Labor & Employment Sec., 377 So.2d 806 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979); Uniweld Prods., Inc. v. Indus. Relations Comm’n, 277 So.2d 827 (Fla. 4th DCA 1973).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cabeza v. Hoffman Sootin & Erro DDS PA, 877 So. 2d 25, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 7375, 2004 WL 1162233 (Fla. Ct. App. 2004).
877 So. 2d 25 (Cabeza v. Hoffman Sootin & Erro DDS PA) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Yanes v. State
877 So. 2d 25 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2004)