Cabey v. New York City Employees' Retirement System

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Cabey v. New York City Employees' Retirement System

10 A.D.2d 571

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 26, 1960

StatusPublished

This text of 10 A.D.2d 571 (Cabey v. New York City Employees' Retirement System) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cabey v. New York City Employees' Retirement System, 10 A.D.2d 571 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1960).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from orders of February 11, 1959, and February 27, 1959, the decision filed March 31, 1959, and the final order of May 5, 1959, dismissed, with $10 costs, unless the appellant settles the original case on appeal before the Trial Justice and files a proper record on appeal and appellant’s points with this court on or before March 1, 1960, with a new notice of argument and note of issue for the April 1960 Term of this court, said appeal to be argued or submitted when reached. If the appellant fails to comply with this condition the petitioner-respondent may submit an order for signature dismissing the appeal, without notice to the appellant. Concur — Botein, P. J., Breitel, Rabin, M. M. Frank and Valente, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from orders of February 11, 1959, and February 27, 1959, the decision filed March 31, 1959, and the final order of May 5, 1959, dismissed, with $10 costs, unless the appellant settles the original case on appeal before the Trial Justice and files a proper record on appeal and appellant’s points with this court on or before March 1, 1960, with a new notice of argument and note of issue for the April 1960 Term of this court, said appeal to be argued or submitted when reached. If the appellant fails to comply with this condition the petitioner-respondent may submit an order for signature dismissing the appeal, without notice to the appellant. Concur — Botein, P. J., Breitel, Rabin, M. M. Frank and Valente, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

10 A.D.2d 571, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cabey-v-new-york-city-employees-retirement-system-nyappdiv-1960.