Cabell County Commission v. Supreme Court of Appeals
This text of 23 Ct. Cl. 120 (Cabell County Commission v. Supreme Court of Appeals) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering West Virginia Court of Claims primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This claim was submitted for decision based upon the allegations in the Notice of Claim and respondent's Answer.
Claimant seeks payment in the amount of $8,908.00 for home confinement drug testing fees which were collected and inadvertently credited to the wrong account for the fiscal years 1992 through 1998, then sent to respondent. Respondent, in its Answer, admits the validity of the claim and the amount,, but states that there were insufficient funds in its appropriation for the fiscal year in question from which to pay the claim.
While the Court believes that this is a claim which in equity and good conscience should be paid, the Court further believes that an award cannot be recommended based upon the decision in Airkem Sales and Service, et al. vs. Dept. of Mental Health, 8 Ct. Cl. 180 (1971).
Claim disallowed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
23 Ct. Cl. 120, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cabell-county-commission-v-supreme-court-of-appeals-wvctcl-2000.