Caballero, Ex Parte Victor Ernesto

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedSeptember 12, 2007
DocketAP-75,763
StatusPublished

This text of Caballero, Ex Parte Victor Ernesto (Caballero, Ex Parte Victor Ernesto) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Caballero, Ex Parte Victor Ernesto, (Tex. 2007).

Opinion



IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS



NO. AP-75,763
EX PARTE VICTOR ERNESTO CABALLERO, Applicant


ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. W02-49134-I(A) IN CRIMINAL DISTRICT COURT NO. 2

FROM DALLAS COUNTY

Per curiam.

O P I N I O N



Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of aggravated assault and sentenced to twenty (20) years' confinement. The Fifth Court of Appeals affirmed his conviction. No. 05-03-00460-CR (Tex. App. - Dallas, 2003, no pet.)

Applicant contends inter alia that his trial counsel rendered ineffective assistance because he failed to inform him of a plea bargain offer of five years' confinement. In support of his claim, Applicant attached a copy of a plea bargain form which shows he was offered five years' confinement in this case.

This Court remanded this application to the trial court for findings of fact and conclusion of law on April 4, 2007. In response to our remand order, the trial court has entered supplemental findings of fact and conclusions of law recommending that relief be granted. The trial court's findings are supported by the record. While this Court is not bound by the findings of the habeas court, we should follow them when they are supported by the record. See Ex parte Minott, 972 S.W.2d 760, 761 (Tex. Crim. App. 1998).

Relief is granted. This Court has held that the appropriate remedy to the injury suffered where defense counsel failed to convey a plea bargain offer is to reinstate the offer. Lemke at 797-798. This cause is remanded to the trial court with the order that the trial court withdraw Applicant's plea, require the State to reinstate its five year plea offer, and allow Applicant to re-plead to the indictment in this cause.

Delivered: September 12, 2007

Do Not Publish

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ex Parte Minott
972 S.W.2d 760 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1998)
Ex Parte Young
418 S.W.2d 824 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1967)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Caballero, Ex Parte Victor Ernesto, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/caballero-ex-parte-victor-ernesto-texcrimapp-2007.