Caan v. Steir

241 A.D. 588, 272 N.Y.S. 774, 1934 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8314

Opinions

Per Curiam.

The complaint states a cause of action. It may be that on the trial the allegations will not be proved. By the answer the defendants very properly plead facts which may, if proved, defeat the plaintiff’s cause of action. It will be necessary to proceed to trial to determine the issues.

The order granting defendants’ motion for judgment on the pleadings should be reversed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements, and said motion denied. The order denying plaintiff’s motion to strike out defenses" and denials should be affirmed.

Present—-'Finch, P. J., Martin, O’Malley, Townley and Glennon, JJ.; Finch, P. J., dissents and votes for affirmance on the first appeal.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Caan v. Steir, 241 A.D. 588, 272 N.Y.S. 774, 1934 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8314 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1934).

241 A.D. 588 (Caan v. Steir) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Friend v. Talcott
228 U.S. 27 (Supreme Court, 1931)
Myers v. International Trust Co.
263 U.S. 64 (Supreme Court, 1923)
Talcott v. Friend
179 F. 676 (Seventh Circuit, 1909)