C.A. Washington, Individually and as Representative of the W.C.T.F. v. Taylor Brooks and Evan McAnulty
This text of C.A. Washington, Individually and as Representative of the W.C.T.F. v. Taylor Brooks and Evan McAnulty (C.A. Washington, Individually and as Representative of the W.C.T.F. v. Taylor Brooks and Evan McAnulty) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
January 24, 2013
JUDGMENT
The Fourteenth Court of Appeals C.A. WASHINGTON, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS REPRESENTATIVE OF THE W.C.T.F., Appellant
NO. 14-12-00495-CV V.
TAYLOR BROOKS AND EVAN MCANULTY, Appellees ________________________________
Today the Court heard the parties’ joint motion to vacate the judgment signed by the court below on February 22, 2012, and remand. Having considered the motion and found it meritorious, we vacate the judgment signed February 22, 2012, and remand the cause to the trial court for rendition of judgment in accordance with the parties’ agreement.
We further order that each party shall pay its costs by reason of this appeal. We further order that mandate be issued immediately. We further order this decision certified below for observance.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
C.A. Washington, Individually and as Representative of the W.C.T.F. v. Taylor Brooks and Evan McAnulty, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ca-washington-individually-and-as-representative-o-texapp-2013.