C. Van Der Lely N v. Appellee/cross-Appellant v. F. Lli Maschio S.N.C., Appellant/cross-Appellee
This text of 748 F.2d 1568 (C. Van Der Lely N v. Appellee/cross-Appellant v. F. Lli Maschio S.N.C., Appellant/cross-Appellee) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
748 F.2d 1568
C. VAN DER LELY N.V., Appellee/Cross-Appellant,
v.
F. LLI MASCHIO S.n.c., Appellant/Cross-Appellee.
Appeal Nos. 84-1119, 84-1145.
United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.
Nov. 28, 1984.
Appealed from the U.S. District Court of Ohio; John D. Holschuh, judge.
Charles L. Gholz, Oblon, Fisher, Spivak, McClelland & Maier, Arlington, Va., argued for appellant. With him on the brief were Robert E. Stebens and Patrick P. Phillips, Columbus, Ohio.
Kenneth E. Payne, Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, Washington, D.C., argued for appellee. With him on the brief were Bruce C. Zotter and Richard L. Stroup, Washington, D.C.
Before FRIEDMAN, DAVIS and BALDWIN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
The judgment of the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio is affirmed on the opinion of that court. 561 F.Supp. 16, 222 USPQ 399. That court's factual findings were not clearly erroneous, its decisions of legal issues were correct, and insofar as discretion was involved, it did not abuse its discretion.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
748 F.2d 1568, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/c-van-der-lely-n-v-appelleecross-appellant-v-f-lli-maschio-snc-cafc-1984.