C. v. Hapik Ridge Hill (NY) LLC

Opinion

— Hh OCUMENT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT List tala cats SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK makes Pe □□□ eT pes SSeS aoe re aia ee DATE PILED: | □ J.C., an infant, etc., et al., □ acti niales eee Plaintiffs, -against- 23-cv-2666 (LAK) HAPIK RIDGE HILL (NY) LLC, Defendant. wee ee ee ee ee ee ee ee ee ee eee ee eee ee ee eee eH HX

ORDER

LEWIS A. KAPLAN, District Judge. Jurisdiction is invoked pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1332. The complaint fails ee to the existence of subject matter jurisdiction because, perhaps among other things, it fails adequately to allege: oe The citizenship of one or more natural persons. See, e.g., Sun Printing & Publishing Ass’n v. Edwards, 194 U.S. 377 (1904); Leveraged Leasing Administration Corp.v. PacifiCorp Capital, Inc., 87 F.3d 44 (2d Cir. 1996). Oo The citizenship of one or more corporations. See 28 U.S.C. § 1332(c)(1). O The citizenship of one or more partnerships. See Carden vy. Arkoma Assocs., 494 U.S. 195 (1990). of The citizenship of one or more limited peo companies. See Handlesman vy. Bedford Village Green Assocs. L.P., 213 F.3d 48, 52 (2d Cir, 2000). O The nature and citizenship of one or more business entities. O The timely removal of the action from state court. In addition, the notice has not be joined in by all defendants. Absent the filing, on or before May 4, 2023, of an amended complaint adequately alleging the existence of subject :natter jurisdiction, this action will be remanded to the state court. SO ORDERED. Dated: April 20, 2023 f Aan, hy _— ee a eee Levis A. Kaplan. United States District Judge