C-TC 9th Avenue Partnership v. Norton Co.

N.D. New York

C-TC 9th Avenue Partnership v. Norton Co.

196 B.R. 666

District Court, N.D. New York·Decided May 17, 1996·No. No. 95-CV-1130·Published

Opinion

ORDER

CHOLAKIS, District Judge.

Presently before the Court is an appeal of the Memorandum-Decision and Order of Bankruptcy Judge Robert E. Littlefield, Jr., dated June 28, 1995, wherein he dismissed the case of debtor C-TC 9th Avenue Partnership. This Court hereby AFFIRMS for substantially the reasons set forth in Bankruptcy Judge Littlefield’s thorough decision regarding the ineligibility of a dissolved partnership to proceed under Chapter 11. In re C-TC 9th Avenue Partnership, 193 B.R. 650 (Bankr.N.D.N.Y.1995). Accordingly, that further portion of the decision, based upon a determination that this ease was not filed in good faith, need not be considered by this Court.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

CHOLAKIS, District Judge.

Presently before the Court is an appeal of the Memorandum-Decision and Order of Bankruptcy Judge Robert E. Littlefield, Jr., dated June 28, 1995, wherein he dismissed the case of debtor C-TC 9th Avenue Partnership. This Court hereby AFFIRMS for substantially the reasons set forth in Bankruptcy Judge Littlefield’s thorough decision regarding the ineligibility of a dissolved partnership to proceed under Chapter 11. In re C-TC 9th Avenue Partnership, 193 B.R. 650 (Bankr.N.D.N.Y.1995). Accordingly, that further portion of the decision, based upon a determination that this ease was not filed in good faith, need not be considered by this Court.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

C-TC 9th Avenue Partnership v. Norton Co., 196 B.R. 666 (N.D.N.Y. 1996).

Pincite

196 B.R. 666 (C-TC 9th Avenue Partnership v. Norton Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related