C. S. Young Construction Co. v. Town of Orange Park

Supreme Court of Florida

C. S. Young Construction Co. v. Town of Orange Park

146 So. 666, 109 Fla. 59

DecidedMarch 14, 1933

StatusPublished

This text of 146 So. 666 (C. S. Young Construction Co. v. Town of Orange Park) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

C. S. Young Construction Co. v. Town of Orange Park, 146 So. 666, 109 Fla. 59 (Fla. 1933).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

In this cause Mr. Chief Justice Davis,Mr. Justice Whitfield and Mr. Justice Terrell are of opinion that the order herein should be reversed, while Mr. Justice Ellis, Mr. Justice Brown and Mr. Justice Buford are of opinion that the said order should be affirmed. ■ When the members of the Supreme Court, sitting six members in a body and after full consultation, it appears that-the members of the Court are permanently and equally divided in opinion as to whether the order should be affirmed or reversed, and there is no prospect of an immediate change in the personnel of the Court, the order should be affirmed ; therefore it is considered, ordered and adjudged under the authority of State ex rel. Hampton v. McClung, 47 Fla. 224, 37 So. R. 51, that the order of the Circuit Court in this cause be and the same is hereby affirmed.

Affirmed.

Davis, C. J., and Whitfield, Ellis, Terrell, Brown and Buford, J. J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

In this cause Mr. Chief Justice Davis,Mr. Justice Whitfield and Mr. Justice Terrell are of opinion that the order herein should be reversed, while Mr. Justice Ellis, Mr. Justice Brown and Mr. Justice Buford are of opinion that the said order should be affirmed. ■ When the members of the Supreme Court, sitting six members in a body and after full consultation, it appears that-the members of the Court are permanently and equally divided in opinion as to whether the order should be affirmed or reversed, and there is no prospect of an immediate change in the personnel of the Court, the order should be affirmed ; therefore it is considered, ordered and adjudged under the authority of State ex rel. Hampton v. McClung, 47 Fla. 224, 37 So. R. 51, that the order of the Circuit Court in this cause be and the same is hereby affirmed.

Affirmed.

Davis, C. J., and Whitfield, Ellis, Terrell, Brown and Buford, J. J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

146 So. 666, 109 Fla. 59, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/c-s-young-construction-co-v-town-of-orange-park-fla-1933.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack