C. S. Tapley Co. v. E. L. Hasler Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

C. S. Tapley Co. v. E. L. Hasler Co.

118 A.D. 917

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 15, 1907·Published

Opinion

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. All concurred, except [918]*918McLennan, P. J., and Kruse, J., who dissented upon the ground that there is no evidence tending to show that Stephen, upon whom the summons was served, was managing agent of the defendant, or that he was ever held out or represented by the defendant to be such. (Taylor v. Granite S. P. Assn., 136 N. Y. 343; Coler v, Pittsburgh Bridge Co., 146 id. 281.)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. All concurred, except [918]*918McLennan, P. J., and Kruse, J., who dissented upon the ground that there is no evidence tending to show that Stephen, upon whom the summons was served, was managing agent of the defendant, or that he was ever held out or represented by the defendant to be such. (Taylor v. Granite S. P. Assn., 136 N. Y. 343; Coler v, Pittsburgh Bridge Co., 146 id. 281.)

C. S. Tapley Co. v. E. L. Hasler Co., 118 A.D. 917 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1907).

Pincite

118 A.D. 917 (C. S. Tapley Co. v. E. L. Hasler Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related