C. Pavlou, Inc. v. Gargano
228 A.D.2d 632, 644 N.Y.2d 994
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 24, 1996·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
The Supreme Court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in relieving the default of the third-party plaintiffs in responding to the third-party defendants’ notice to admit (see, CPLR 3123, 2005; Gutenplan v Dauman, 154 AD2d 337). O’Brien, J. P., Sullivan, Florio and McGinity, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
C. Pavlou, Inc. v. Gargano, 228 A.D.2d 632, 644 N.Y.2d 994 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).
228 A.D.2d 632 (C. Pavlou, Inc. v. Gargano) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Torres v. McCormick
35 A.D.3d 443 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)