C & P Telephone Co. v. Subsequent Injury Fund
466 A.2d 39, 297 Md. 339, 1983 Md. LEXIS 306
Court of Appeals of Maryland·Decided October 10, 1983·No. [No. 30, September Term, 1983.]·Published·Cited by 9 cases
Opinion
The petition for writ of certiorari having been granted, the judgment of the Court of Special Appeals affirming the judgment of the Baltimore City Court in C & P Telephone Company of Maryland v. Subsequent Injury Fund, 53 Md. App. 508, 453 A.2d 1243 (1983) is affirmed for the reasons set forth in the opinion of Judge Adkins.
Judgment of the Court of Special Appeals affirmed.
Costs to be paid by the petitioner.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
C & P Telephone Co. v. Subsequent Injury Fund, 466 A.2d 39, 297 Md. 339, 1983 Md. LEXIS 306 (Md. 1983).
466 A.2d 39 (C & P Telephone Co. v. Subsequent Injury Fund) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Injured Workers' Insurance Fund v. Subsequent Injury Fund
135 A.3d 365 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 2016)
Sahin v. State
653 A.2d 452 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1995)
Collins v. State
854 P.2d 688 (Wyoming Supreme Court, 1993)
Subsequent Injury Fund v. Teneyck
566 A.2d 94 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1989)
McKenzie v. C.C. Kottcamp & Sons, Inc.
532 A.2d 703 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1987)
Subsequent Injury Fund v. Kraus
482 A.2d 468 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1984)
Grant v. State
473 A.2d 455 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1984)