C. P. A. Co. v. Commissioner

Sixth Circuit

C. P. A. Co. v. Commissioner

134 F.2d 616, 30 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 1174, 1943 U.S. App. LEXIS 3635

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

DecidedFebruary 17, 1943

DocketNo. 9194

StatusPublished

This text of 134 F.2d 616 (C. P. A. Co. v. Commissioner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

C. P. A. Co. v. Commissioner, 134 F.2d 616, 30 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 1174, 1943 U.S. App. LEXIS 3635 (6th Cir. 1943).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

On stipulation, it was agreed that if petitioner is a life insurance company according to the definition set forth in the provisions of Sec. 201(a) of the Revenue Acts of 1934 and 1936, 26 U.S.C.A. Int. Rev.Code, § 201(a), it is not subject to income tax for those years; otherwise, it is so liable. These statutory provisions define a life insurance company as one “engaged in the business of issuing life insurance and annuity contracts (including contracts of combined life, health, and accident insurance).” The contracts issued by petitioner were not life insurance and annuity contracts, nor were they contracts of combined life, health, and accident insurance.

The decision of the Board of Tax Appeals (now the Tax Court of the United States), holding petitioner liable for the taxes above mentioned, is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

On stipulation, it was agreed that if petitioner is a life insurance company according to the definition set forth in the provisions of Sec. 201(a) of the Revenue Acts of 1934 and 1936, 26 U.S.C.A. Int. Rev.Code, § 201(a), it is not subject to income tax for those years; otherwise, it is so liable. These statutory provisions define a life insurance company as one “engaged in the business of issuing life insurance and annuity contracts (including contracts of combined life, health, and accident insurance).” The contracts issued by petitioner were not life insurance and annuity contracts, nor were they contracts of combined life, health, and accident insurance.

The decision of the Board of Tax Appeals (now the Tax Court of the United States), holding petitioner liable for the taxes above mentioned, is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

134 F.2d 616, 30 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 1174, 1943 U.S. App. LEXIS 3635, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/c-p-a-co-v-commissioner-ca6-1943.