C. O. Bolt and Lawrence King, Individually, Etc. v. Joint Council Dining Car Employees

Fifth Circuit

C. O. Bolt and Lawrence King, Individually, Etc. v. Joint Council Dining Car Employees

328 F.2d 313

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided April 10, 1964·No. 20298_1·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

It appearing on the face of the complaint filed by the appellants herein that the parties and the alleged issues presented are in substance the same as those which were heretofore disposed of by this Court between the same parties and reported at 301 F.2d 20, we conclude that the trial court properly dismissed the complaint on the plea of res adjudieata.

The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

It appearing on the face of the complaint filed by the appellants herein that the parties and the alleged issues presented are in substance the same as those which were heretofore disposed of by this Court between the same parties and reported at 301 F.2d 20, we conclude that the trial court properly dismissed the complaint on the plea of res adjudieata.

The judgment is affirmed.

C. O. Bolt and Lawrence King, Individually, Etc. v. Joint Council Dining Car Employees, 328 F.2d 313 (5th Cir. 1964).

Pincite

328 F.2d 313 (C. O. Bolt and Lawrence King, Individually, Etc. v. Joint Council Dining Car Employees) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.