C. O. Bolt and Lawrence King, Individually, Etc. v. Joint Council Dining Car Employees

Fifth Circuit

C. O. Bolt and Lawrence King, Individually, Etc. v. Joint Council Dining Car Employees

328 F.2d 313

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

DecidedApril 10, 1964

Docket20298_1

StatusPublished

This text of 328 F.2d 313 (C. O. Bolt and Lawrence King, Individually, Etc. v. Joint Council Dining Car Employees) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

C. O. Bolt and Lawrence King, Individually, Etc. v. Joint Council Dining Car Employees, 328 F.2d 313 (5th Cir. 1964).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

It appearing on the face of the complaint filed by the appellants herein that the parties and the alleged issues presented are in substance the same as those which were heretofore disposed of by this Court between the same parties and reported at 301 F.2d 20, we conclude that the trial court properly dismissed the complaint on the plea of res adjudieata.

The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

It appearing on the face of the complaint filed by the appellants herein that the parties and the alleged issues presented are in substance the same as those which were heretofore disposed of by this Court between the same parties and reported at 301 F.2d 20, we conclude that the trial court properly dismissed the complaint on the plea of res adjudieata.

The judgment is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

328 F.2d 313, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/c-o-bolt-and-lawrence-king-individually-etc-v-joint-council-dining-ca5-1964.