C & N Service Corp. v. Garzia

439 So. 2d 1016, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 23552
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedOctober 31, 1983
DocketNo. AR-292
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 439 So. 2d 1016 (C & N Service Corp. v. Garzia) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
C & N Service Corp. v. Garzia, 439 So. 2d 1016, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 23552 (Fla. Ct. App. 1983).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The deputy commissioner’s finding that chiropractic treatment was required by the continuing nature of claimant’s injury is supported by substantial competent evidence and proper in law. See section 440.-13, Florida Statutes (1977), Di Giorgio Fruit Corp. v. Pittman, 49 So.2d 600 (Fla.1950), and Lopez v. Pennsuco Cement & Aggregates, Inc., 401 So.2d 875 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981).

AFFIRMED.

ROBERT P. SMITH, Jr., BOOTH and WIGGINTON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Coleman v. Estate of Coleman
439 So. 2d 1016 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1983)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
439 So. 2d 1016, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 23552, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/c-n-service-corp-v-garzia-fladistctapp-1983.