C & N Service Corp. v. Garzia
This text of 439 So. 2d 1016 (C & N Service Corp. v. Garzia) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The deputy commissioner’s finding that chiropractic treatment was required by the continuing nature of claimant’s injury is supported by substantial competent evidence and proper in law. See section 440.-13, Florida Statutes (1977), Di Giorgio Fruit Corp. v. Pittman, 49 So.2d 600 (Fla.1950), and Lopez v. Pennsuco Cement & Aggregates, Inc., 401 So.2d 875 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981).
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
439 So. 2d 1016, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 23552, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/c-n-service-corp-v-garzia-fladistctapp-1983.