C & N Service Corp. v. Garzia

439 So. 2d 1016, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 23552
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 31, 1983·No. No. AR-292·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The deputy commissioner’s finding that chiropractic treatment was required by the continuing nature of claimant’s injury is supported by substantial competent evidence and proper in law. See section 440.-13, Florida Statutes (1977), Di Giorgio Fruit Corp. v. Pittman, 49 So.2d 600 (Fla.1950), and Lopez v. Pennsuco Cement & Aggregates, Inc., 401 So.2d 875 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981).

AFFIRMED.

ROBERT P. SMITH, Jr., BOOTH and WIGGINTON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

C & N Service Corp. v. Garzia, 439 So. 2d 1016, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 23552 (Fla. Ct. App. 1983).

439 So. 2d 1016 (C & N Service Corp. v. Garzia) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Coleman v. Estate of Coleman
439 So. 2d 1016 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1983)